FlyOrDie.com
« Back to All Topics
Ratings - don't play someone lower than yourself!
Posted in 
Backgammon
Ratings - don't play someone lower than yourself!
Posted in 
Backgammon
Ratings - don't play someone lower than yourself!
Developer - thank you so much for the recent updates to the game.  In all, I think most would agree it is much better.

There is one major issue that has not been addressed, and that is the fact that any player who cares about their rating knows that they should not play someone with a lower ranking.

(Yes, I know some people don't care about their ranking, and this doesn't apply to them)

It's no secret that playing someone even a few points lower than you means that you are risking more than you will gain from a win.  

In a game like Backgammon win margins between a good player and a poor player are thin (a good player wins more over time, but will always have losses because of bad luck here and there).

This means that people with the highest ratings are not those who are necessarily the best, but those who adhere to the principle of not playing someone with a lower rating.

All of us do this - enter the lobby wanting to play a game, and being denied games by everyone with a slightly higher rating (why would they want an unfair disadvantage).  Similarly, we feel compelled to deny games to those lower than us (why give the other guy an advantage.)

This is really unfortunate, because the skill level between a 800 ranked player and a 700 ranked player is probably the same.  But the 800 ranked player has a huge incentive to avoid playing the 700 ranked player.

Please consider a revamp of the weights of Backgammon matches between players with different rankings.  Players within a 100 or 150 point spread should be on equal footing.

If you make this change, make sure players are aware of this within the Backgammon rooms.  Suddenly, we will all  be able to play more games because we won't have to worry about the unfair advantage to the lesser rated players.

Back me up on this people!!
Absolutely true, even if I'm now at 1073 and above them all, it's very true.
I agree with you about the reluctance to play someone with a lower rating.  A very east, and effective, way to immediately put an end to this would be for players to lose the equivalent number of points that they would lose if they lost the game if they decline a challenge. It would probably be fair if this only applied to players of similar ratings eg both green or both blue.
I agree 100% with colleague. I really enjoyed the changes that were made on site, mainly regarding the player forfeits a match, before removing a stone from the board and lost for backgammon, with double points of what is wagered. However, I found that there are cases where the player manages to escape without losing double. He just left the room without giving up. This is a flaw that should be fixed. Even where backgammon is triple escape is possible to defeat simple. I wish that this fault was corrected.
As for the differences between players also agree 100% with the colleague. Should only be direfença scoring when graduation is more than 150 points.
It would be nice if there was answer these issues.
Thank you!
Languages
English
English
azərbaycan
Azerbaijani
bosanski
Bosnian
čeština
Czech
Cymraeg
Welsh
dansk
Danish
Deutsch
German
eesti
Estonian
English
English
español
Spanish
euskara
Basque
français
French
hrvatski
Croatian
Indonesia
Indonesian
isiZulu
Zulu
íslenska
Icelandic
italiano
Italian
latviešu
Latvian
lietuvių
Lithuanian
magyar
Hungarian
Malti
Maltese
Melayu
Malay
Nederlands
Dutch
norsk
Norwegian
o‘zbek
Uzbek
polski
Polish
português
Portuguese
română
Romanian
shqip
Albanian
slovenčina
Slovak
slovenščina
Slovenian
suomi
Finnish
svenska
Swedish
Tagalog
Tagalog
Tiếng Việt
Vietnamese
Türkçe
Turkish
Vlaams
Flemish
Võro
Võro
Ελληνικά
Greek
български
Bulgarian
кыргызча
Kyrgyz
русский
Russian
српски
Serbian
українська
Ukrainian
עברית
Hebrew
العربية
Arabic
فارسی
Persian
हिन्दी
Hindi
ไทย
Thai
ქართული
Georgian
中文
Chinese
日本語
Japanese
한국어
Korean