bobeubanks
Joined: 
Last seen: 
7 hours ago
Fanatic
☰
Sign in
Search Player
About
Chess
All games
Informant Chess
34 points
4,635 matches
Chess
148 points
2,388 matches
Checkers
13 points
1,073 matches
Backgammon
34 points
581 matches
Blitz Chess
17 points
347 matches
Curling
0 points
158 matches
Reversi
33 points
149 matches
Memory
17 points
8 matches
Go-Moku
6 points
5 matches
Four in a Row
19 points
1 match
Bullet Chess
0 points
1 match
Bullet Chess 2
0 points
1 match
Chess statistics
101
rating
Intermediate
2388matches
62%
wins
(1486)
32usual opponent rating
Rating History
Results
Opponent
Result
Rating
Opponent rating
1 year ago
omar82
(~0)
2 - 0
137
11
~0
1 year ago
fraquinha
(25)
1 - 0
126
11
25
1 year ago
atıcılargenc
(69)
1 - 0
112
14
69
1 year ago
hx-2
(76)
0 - 1
131
-19
76
1 year ago
edson6
(44)
1 - 0
118
13
44
1 year ago
Ragoncsa
(0)
1 - 0
107
11
0
1 year ago
-
(~95)
1 - 0
94
13
~95
1 year ago
$Rich Rollin$
(71)
1 - 1
96
-2
71
1 year ago
mouaad.42
(42)
2 - 0
74
22
42
1 year ago
Eliezer Silva
(45)
1 - 1
76
-2
45
1 year ago
Black Knight2
(67)
0 - 1
93
-17
67
1 year ago
Mehmet694
(52)
1 - 0
78
15
52
1 year ago
Alain4
(31)
1 - 0
63
15
31
1 year ago
lynxpardinus
(31)
2 - 1
56
7
31
3 years ago
cocool
(51)
0 - 1
97
-18
51
3 years ago
gancio
(17)
1 - 0
84
13
17
3 years ago
Ágica11
(82)
0 - 1
101
-17
82
3 years ago
Macvilas
(16)
1 - 0
88
13
16
3 years ago
mtn ady
(0)
2 - 2
96
-8
0
Last seen: 
Joined: 
Latest Forum Posts
Draws
I agree. Using Elo as FIDE uses would be vastly superior to the current method.
How did you get to 600+ if "the program is to setlle low rankings"?
It would be much harder to write the program to NOT be random than to write it to be fair/random. An
It takes much more effort to write code to favor one player over another than to just be fair. And t
More »